Enter cargo dimensions, quantities, and weight to compare container capacity, realistic loading ratio, payload limits, and volumetric weight in one place.
Recommended loading result
Actual stuffing can differ by packaging strength, weight distribution, lashing, site equipment, and carrier equipment specs.
Total CBM
67.63 m3
Total weight
13,240 kg
Recommended mix
1
TEU 2.25
Remaining space
8.1 m3
Volume use
79%
Weight use
48%
Against real load
89%
Real loading ratio 88%
Loading options
Presets
| Container | Containers | Volume use | Weight use | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20FT DRY | 3 | 68% | 20% | OK |
| 40FT DRY | 2 | 50% | 25% | OK |
| 40FT HC | 2 | 44% | 25% | Review |
| 45FT HC | 1 | 79% | 48% | OK |
Auto candidates
45HC x 1
TEU 2.25 / Volume use 79%
20FT x 1 + 40FT x 1
TEU 3 / Volume use 67%
20FT x 1 + 40HC x 1
TEU 3 / Volume use 62%
20FT x 3
TEU 3 / Volume use 68%
Air volumetric
11,294 kg
Express volumetric
13,526 kg
Chargeable reference
13,526 kg
Ocean RT
67.63 RT
45FT HC - First container - 67.6 / 75.7 m3
CBM plan 89% · 3D packed 75%
Drag or touch to rotate, pan, and zoom.
Loaded
566 / 608
Shown
566
Unplaced
42
Volume use
75%
Load score
84
| Item | Size | Unit CBM | Total | Per container | Best orientation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carton A | 600 x 400 x 350 mm | 0.084 | 35.28 m3 / 5,040 kg | 792 | 600 x 350 x 400 mm22 x 6 x 6 |
| Carton B | 500 x 450 x 500 mm | 0.1125 | 20.25 m3 / 3,240 kg | 405 | 500 x 450 x 500 mm27 x 5 x 3 |
| KR Pallet | 1100 x 1100 x 1250 mm | 1.5125 | 12.1 m3 / 4,960 kg | 24 | 1100 x 1100 x 1250 mm12 x 2 x 1 |
Logistics planning notice
This tool is a planning aid only. Actual freight charges, customs treatment, chargeable weight, carrier rules, warehouse limits, and contractual terms must be confirmed with the carrier, forwarder, warehouse, or official shipping documents.
Save this result, compare previous runs, or share a report.
The planner compares CBM, internal dimensions, rotation rules, stacking, pallet handling, realistic loading efficiency, and payload limits for common dry containers.
No. Final loading depends on packaging strength, weight balance, lashing, forklift access, and carrier equipment specifications.
Yes. Add multiple cargo rows and set rotation, laying down, stacking, and stack limits for each row.
Pure CBM can overstate capacity because workers need handling space and cargo does not always tessellate perfectly.
English picks
Continue with curated tools that match this workflow.
Practical cases
Review the conditions commonly missed in loading and freight comparisons.
Nominal cubic capacity alone can point to the wrong container. A realistic choice also checks internal dimensions, carton orientation, pallets, stack height, payload and door clearance.
Air is fast but volumetric weight can be high. Ocean is cheaper per unit but adds lead time and inventory financing. Compare total delivered cost and the cost of delay.
CBM measures occupied space. Volumetric weight converts that space into a billing weight. Air and ocean freight use different rules, so the same shipment can have different chargeable bases.
Keep exploring
Jump into related tools from the same category and popular picks across Gogotem.
Estimate cartons per layer, stack height, and total pallet capacity from pallet and carton size.
Compare actual and dimensional weight across multiple packages to estimate billable weight and freight.
Calculate carton count, reserve-adjusted quantity, and last-box fill from total units.
Calculate total CBM and cubic feet from carton size and quantity.
Estimate customs value, duties, VAT, and landed cost from merchandise, freight, insurance, and local handling.
Compare actual weight, volumetric weight, and sea revenue ton from total CBM and cargo weight.